First time, when I saw the title of this news, I thought that it would relate with the stories that people might thought that they have some evident supported their theories, but the evident was not strong enough, so they still need witness and evident more to make their theories stronger and more reliable.
In "Fanning the flame of conspiracy theories ", this story is about the chief editor of Poland’s leading conservative newspaper, Rzeczpospolita, and two other employees have left their jobs because they publishing an inaccurate report which reported about the airplane crashed in Smolensk, Russia in 2010 which the president of Poland and 95 other VIP were dead in the Smolensk tragedy. Their reports pointed out the Smolensk tragedy was an assassination by initialed front-page story said that investigators recently found explosive chemical substance around the wreck of the aircraft and accused the prime minister of the Republic of Poland.
After I finish read that news, I thought that they might be right about the conspiracy theories because they show the relation in two suicides of people who was witness and was involved with this story, but they should believe evident more than the words from their sourcing that can corroborate the report.To make truth clearly, I suggested that the polish government should proof the truth by form an international team of investigators to find the truth.
______________________________________________________________
Reference
Fanning the flame of conspiracy theories, (2012, November 6). The Economist Eastern approaches Ex-communist Europe. Retrieved November 7, 2012 from http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2012/11/polish-politics
Yes, I really agree with you. In our modern time, this theory have been mentioned a lot. I think it good that we have several aspects to find the real answer, but the problem is that people use it for accuse someone else particularly in political issues. It is insecurity for innocents in our society.
ReplyDelete